C++ guys hate static_if?

[Walter Bright]

On 3/14/2013 2:26 PM, bearophile wrote:
> Walter Bright:
>
>> I understand this. But my experience in the matter has been that if the tests
>> cover 100% of the code paths, the incidence of undetected bugs in the code
>> goes very, very low.
>
> This is not so much true for template-heavy code.

I don't believe that without further evidence.


> And 100% code coverage is not enough even for regular code,

I didn't say it was perfect. I said it is very effective, and doesn't leave much 
left. I have very positive experience with code I took the time to do coverage 
testing on, and so have others.