Any takers for http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673?

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Sun Mar 17 09:10:41 PDT 2013


On 2013-03-10 16:44, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:

> I think this is a serious problem. I hadn't thought of it before, but if
> we are designing our tools to work around implementation issues in the
> compiler, I think we're doing something wrong. Rather than meddling with
> a crippled incremental compilation model for rdmd that'll get obsoleted
> by a fixed compiler, how about attacking the problem directly?
>
> It doesn't help that the problems surrounding incremental compilation (I
> mean the general case with incrementally compiling a few modules at
> once, not deadalnix's bug) don't seem to be well-defined. Do we have a
> filed issue with a reproducible test case?

Search for posts by Tomasz Stachowiak (h3r3tic). He tried to implement 
incremental compilation a couple of years ago.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list