Raising the bar on Phobos unittest coverage
Martin Nowak
code at dawg.eu
Mon Mar 18 09:34:12 PDT 2013
On 03/18/2013 02:00 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> From now on, I'd like such unittest coverage (and justification for low
> coverage) to be part of the minimum standard for all new phobos modules.
Great.
> $(DMD) -cov=83 -unittest -main -run std\file.d
Can someone look into std.file's unittests. They use 60% (32s/50s) of
the unittest RUNtime on my machine.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list