Raising the bar on Phobos unittest coverage

Martin Nowak code at dawg.eu
Mon Mar 18 09:34:12 PDT 2013


On 03/18/2013 02:00 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>  From now on, I'd like such unittest coverage (and justification for low
> coverage) to be part of the minimum standard for all new phobos modules.

Great.

> $(DMD) -cov=83 -unittest -main -run std\file.d

Can someone look into std.file's unittests. They use 60% (32s/50s) of 
the unittest RUNtime on my machine.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list