Raising the bar on Phobos unittest coverage

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Mar 18 16:21:58 PDT 2013


On 3/18/2013 4:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> The normal thing to do with unit tests when you want to have them enabled on
> part of the time is to use a version block. And you have to recompile whenever
> you make changes anyway, so I wouldn't expect it to be a big deal in general.

Also, a unittest executable is built and then run and then deleted. I see no 
point to keeping it around and running it in different ways, hence no real value 
in passing parameters to it via an environment variable.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list