The new std.process is ready for review
Vladimir Panteleev
vladimir at thecybershadow.net
Thu Mar 21 04:08:00 PDT 2013
On Wednesday, 20 March 2013 at 22:46:58 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, but I've pushed a new version now. There
> are still a few things I haven't done wrt. documentation* and
> unittests**, but the changes to the API and internals should be
> in place.
Since (IIRC) all issues regarding incompatibility with
std.process have been resolved, how about renaming the module to
std.process? This way it'll also be easier to test
backwards-compatibility in existing programs.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list