The new std.process is ready for review

Vladimir Panteleev vladimir at thecybershadow.net
Thu Mar 21 04:08:00 PDT 2013


On Wednesday, 20 March 2013 at 22:46:58 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad 
wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, but I've pushed a new version now.  There 
> are still a few things I haven't done wrt. documentation* and 
> unittests**, but the changes to the API and internals should be 
> in place.

Since (IIRC) all issues regarding incompatibility with 
std.process have been resolved, how about renaming the module to 
std.process? This way it'll also be easier to test 
backwards-compatibility in existing programs.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list