The new std.process is ready for review

[H. S. Teoh]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:08:00PM +0100, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20 March 2013 at 22:46:58 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad
> wrote:
> >Sorry for the delay, but I've pushed a new version now.  There are
> >still a few things I haven't done wrt. documentation* and
> >unittests**, but the changes to the API and internals should be in
> >place.
> 
> Since (IIRC) all issues regarding incompatibility with std.process
> have been resolved, how about renaming the module to std.process?
> This way it'll also be easier to test backwards-compatibility in
> existing programs.

+1. I hate std.process2 with a passion. Let's keep it as std.process.


T

-- 
The computer is only a tool. Unfortunately, so is the user. -- Armaphine, K5