this is almost a workaround for the lack of named parameters

[bearophile]

Jacob Carlborg:

> What do you think about my suggestion for anonymous structs as 
> named parameters?

You show code like:

void foo ({ int x, int y } point)
{
}

foo({ y: 5, x: 3 });


D already has two kinds of tuples so I don't want a "third kind" 
of tuple. What I want is D to manage better the Phobos Tuple we 
already have, adding an unpacking syntax 
(http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gridjorxqlpoytuxwpsg@forum.dlang.org 
). (This is not supposed to solve the named arguments problem).

Bye,
bearophile