D => asm.js for the web?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-03-23 18:47, Nick Sabalausky wrote:

> Totally different domain. We're talking about replacing JS due to JS's
> problems when used heavily. Any site that uses JS that heavily in the
> first place wouldn't be working on IE6 anyway. So, if you're making
> such a JS-heavy site that a "NewJS" could even matter at all, then
> you've *already* made the decision (explicitly or implicitly,
> ill-advised or not) to not support IE6.
>
> In other words, a site that needs to work on IE6 isn't going to
> be JS-heavy enough to benefit from "NewJS". Therefore,
> the whole issue of a "NewJS" isn't relevant to IE6 at all.

What I mean is that users don't upgrade to the latest version of their 
browser.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg