D => asm.js for the web?

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:03:16 +0100
Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:

> On 2013-03-23 18:47, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> 
> > Totally different domain. We're talking about replacing JS due to
> > JS's problems when used heavily. Any site that uses JS that heavily
> > in the first place wouldn't be working on IE6 anyway. So, if you're
> > making such a JS-heavy site that a "NewJS" could even matter at
> > all, then you've *already* made the decision (explicitly or
> > implicitly, ill-advised or not) to not support IE6.
> >
> > In other words, a site that needs to work on IE6 isn't going to
> > be JS-heavy enough to benefit from "NewJS". Therefore,
> > the whole issue of a "NewJS" isn't relevant to IE6 at all.
> 
> What I mean is that users don't upgrade to the latest version of
> their browser.
> 

That's why there's the "fallback to JS" stuff.