Proposal for SentinelInputRange
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Sun Mar 24 08:33:49 PDT 2013
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 14:37:18 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 12:22:37 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 11:49:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> wrote:
>>> On 3/24/13 7:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
>>>> I finally decided to write a post about such imaginary
>>>> "sufficiently
>>>> smart compilers" that clearly don't exists today, never will
>>>> and so we
>>>> have to clutter the language :
>>>> http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/03/23/a-story-about-optimization-llvm-and-the-sentinelinputrange/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I really hope that someone wrote this imaginary LLVM thing
>>>> everybody is
>>>> talking about !
>>>
>>> Looking great (also love the page design). The piece has a
>>> few systematic English language errors that should be easy to
>>> fix. Would you want to accept a copyedit step from a native
>>> speaker, and if so, is anyone here inclined to do that?
>>>
>>
>> I'd be happy to, if someone want to do it.
>
> I copied and pasted in to libreoffice for editing:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/910836/sentinal.odt or
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/910836/sentinal.doc
>
>
> There are 2 comments from me, they are in [] and highlighted in
> yellow. You'll probably want to address them and then delete
> them.
>
> There were a lot of grammatical mistakes that have now been
> fixed and a couple of sentences have been rearranged. I had
> planned to work as Andrei suggested with "before -> after" but
> I quickly realised the edit file would be longer than the
> document!
>
> P.S.
> I may have accidentally introduced some British English by
> accident, perhaps a native American English speaker will spot
> them.
That is much better now. Thank a lot, I updated the article.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list