The new std.process is ready for review

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 14:10:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-03-26 14:07, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>
>> If this gets added *before* the new std.process, we should at 
>> least
>> agree on a consistent naming convention.  The new std.process 
>> has
>> @property thisProcessID(), which replaces getpid(), and which 
>> is
>> somewhat consistent with std.concurrency.thisTid.  I also think
>> std.file.getcwd() is part of this function family, and that it 
>> should be
>> moved to std.process (under a different name).
>>
>> Personally, I dislike function names that start with "get".
>
> so what would you prefer, "thisProcessPath"? Or 
> thisExecutablePath, perhaps?

Something like that, with @property.  thisProcessExecutable is 
also an option, but it's rather long.  I think I prefer 
thisExecutablePath.

Lars