DIP32: Uniform tuple syntax
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Fri Mar 29 06:32:02 PDT 2013
Simen Kjærås:
> All in all, I really like this, but agree with bearophile that
> some parts may be better left for a future DIP.
On the other hand it's important that the Stage1 DIP should be
designed to not make it impossible to add future tuple
enhancements. So a draft of the Stage2 should be written from the
start, to have a more global vision of the situation.
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list