My thoughts & tries with rvalue references

[Namespace]

> I have to agree on that. My first impression was that ref& is 
> equal to c++11 &&
>
> Kind Regards
> Benjamin Thaut

Ok, it seems that I think differently.
And what is the general opinion of '&A' instead of 'ref &A'?
It has all the benefits that I described in my first post, but it 
may not be so confusing.
If you like to ask "why not A&": That is more complex as it seems 
to be, a opinion which is shared by Jonathan.
And I sincerely hope that no one is annoyed about my attempts to 
solve this problem.