The liabilities of binding rvalues to ref

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 5/4/13 10:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Please explain your understanding of what we agreed on.

Just the factual events. We all said repeatedly in the beginning of the 
discussion that "we focus only on the safety aspect for now and then 
figure the rvalue references thing". I've heard you say it at least two 
times clear as day. We can't now construe a solution to the safety 
matter into a solution to binding rvalues to ref.

I'll post separately about the issues involved with binding rvalues to 
references, but I'm retorting to this rather strongly because we must be 
clear, before getting into any level of detail, that we are not done 
with rvalues and ref.


Thanks,

Andrei