The liabilities of binding rvalues to ref

[Walter Bright]

On 5/4/2013 10:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/4/13 10:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Please explain your understanding of what we agreed on.
>
> Just the factual events. We all said repeatedly in the beginning of the
> discussion that "we focus only on the safety aspect for now and then figure the
> rvalue references thing". I've heard you say it at least two times clear as day.
> We can't now construe a solution to the safety matter into a solution to binding
> rvalues to ref.
>
> I'll post separately about the issues involved with binding rvalues to
> references, but I'm retorting to this rather strongly because we must be clear,
> before getting into any level of detail, that we are not done with rvalues and ref.

What I was talking about was the "no-op" thing with rvalue references, and yes, 
we deferred that.