Request d.vim testing

Jesse Phillips Jessekphillips+D at gmail.com
Mon May 20 16:20:07 PDT 2013


On Monday, 20 May 2013 at 23:08:26 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> I've fixed cgdb syntax highlighting for various literals here.
>
> https://github.com/cgdb/cgdb/pull/22
>
> Wonder if anyone has any ideas for q"( strings )"
>
> Regards

In case you don't know (guessing you might not based on the 
comment):

q{ Token string here }

q"( custom wysiwyg string delimiter )"

The first should probably highlight as normal code (Vim is doing 
that). The second is a normal string.

The token string is interesting since it can be used to house 
non-D language making D not necessarily the proper highlighting 
scheme.... hmm I wonder if I could make vim.d identify the 
language (probably needs specific indicator though).


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list