Request d.vim testing

[Jesse Phillips]

On Monday, 20 May 2013 at 23:30:48 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> On Monday, 20 May 2013 at 23:20:08 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> The token string is interesting since it can be used to house 
>> non-D language making D not necessarily the proper 
>> highlighting scheme.... hmm I wonder if I could make vim.d 
>> identify the language (probably needs specific indicator 
>> though).
>
> The standard says "In between must be valid D tokens", so I'm 
> not sure that's actually the case.

That just means it can be tokenized; pretty much anything can be 
tokenized.

I was going to give an example of something that would fail... 
but I can't think of anything that should fail. My first thought 
was '45oau' since identifiers can't start with a number... but my 
testing shows this is accepted.