status of shared libs

Manu turkeyman at gmail.com
Thu May 23 03:33:31 PDT 2013


On 23 May 2013 16:28, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:

> On 2013-05-23 03:01, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
>
>  1. D executable, C dll => always worked
>>> 2. D executable, D dll, statically loaded => now in 2.063 HEAD
>>> 3. D executable, D dll, dynamically loaded (hot swapping) = not yet
>>> 4. C executable, D dll => not yet
>>>
>>
>> now? :)
>>
>
> 2 works. 4 could possibly work if it's statically loaded. Although I'm not
> sure if the runtime will be properly initialized from C.
>
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg
>

Is there an ETA for any any of these? case 3 is of critical importance...
and also 5. C executable, D dll, dynamically loaded (hot swapping)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130523/9caa6994/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list