DLang Spec rewrite (?)

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 5/25/13 8:56 PM, Borden wrote:
> My contention is that, for the purposes of writing lengthy, non-code
> documentation like the DLang spec (I'm not referring to any other
> documentation or pages on the site), enclosing the entire exposition in
> macros has made the source too inflexible for me to work with without
> awkward workarounds or having to write my own parser. Again, the idea is
> to use the features of HTML5 and compile the DLang spec into an ePub
> document that I can read on my brand-new Kobo.

This is a worthy goal. We manage to generate mobi files for the spec 
(and Phobos in a pull request), is the ebook format very different?

Andrei