DMD source violates c++11 standards.

[Borden]

On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:12:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/27/2013 4:47 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> "Hans W. Uhlig" <huhlig at gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:idtvbddofuxwpsbtowsj at forum.dlang.org...
>>> This also makes compiling LDC with clang rather difficult
>>>
>>
>> DMD is not written in C++11.  Turning of the C++11 warnings in 
>> clang will
>> fix this problem.
>>
>>
>
> Also, you can submit a bugzilla entry for it, or even a pull 
> request. There's no reason for such code in DMD to remain.

I was thinking about that: surely D's mature enough that dmd can 
be written in D?