[article] Language Design Deal Breakers

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 5/29/13 5:20 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 May 2013 at 07:50:39 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
>> Currently I recognize that it is necessary to fix compiler bugs around
>> @disable this(); at least.
>>
>> @deadalnix, it seems to me that you argue that @disable this(); is
>> insufficient or useless to implement NotNull!T. If so, what is
>> necessary to
>> do it? What is impossible thing by NotNullT?
>>
>
> No I'm nto saying that this is impossible, I'm saying that @disable
> this() and non nullable pointer are the exact same feature.

Implication is not equivalence.

Andrei