I may have found a bug.

[Jeremy DeHaan]

On Wednesday, 29 May 2013 at 11:08:55 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 May 2013 at 10:33:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 29 May 2013 at 07:32:42 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> static variables are thread local. Are you sure the destructor 
>> run in the same thread as the constructor ?
>
> Actually it fails because _aaDelX calls gc, and gc is not 
> reenterable. It has nothing to do with static or thread locals.

But if I declare the AA as a module scope variable,static or not, 
in a different module, then I no longer get the invalid memory 
exception. It runs just fine.