The stately := operator feature proposal

monarch_dodra monarchdodra at gmail.com
Thu May 30 08:05:39 PDT 2013


On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 14:55:38 UTC, someone wrote:
> Please think about the huge math and science community. Most of 
> them I came across like D for its speed and efficiency. But D 
> can never replace Matlab/Octave/Ipython/Scipy because ....
>
> .. of the messy syntax compared to almost math like syntax 
> above languages offer.
>
> For example, if I want to quickly want to plot something, in 
> Octave I would do:
>
> x = linspace(0, 2*pi, 1000);
> y = sin(x);
> plot(x, y)

I could be mistaken, but those languages don't have the notion of 
declaration, do they? (honest question)

Last time I tried a similar language, basically, any variable 
name that is not yet used is resolved to null. Which is why the 
syntax work.

D on the other hand has a strong notion of declaration, and 
construction.

I'm not sure it's just a matter of "messy syntax", and more of 
different paradigms. In D, it is more important to make the 
distinction of construction/assignment. The syntax is messy, but 
the new syntax blurs that line.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list