Inability to dup/~ for const arrays of class objects

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Thursday, May 30, 2013 19:44:17 Maxim Fomin wrote:
> I was looking for explanation why after years of stable array
> definition one article abolish official spec (without changing
> it) and major implementation without any Walter or Andrei
> approval. I got an answer in previous comment but found it
> unsatisfactory: simply because somebody considers that D
> definitions contradict to some external notions is not a reason
> to change it. There are other places in D which do not correspond
> with names in other languages or with general terms. Also, there
> is as much opinions, as much people, so moving language toward
> some external definition is a problematic task.
> 
> It would be good if Walter or Andrei comment on this.

Then you'll probably need to start a new thread on it. They're unlikely to see 
any of this (let alone comment on it) if they haven't already been involved in 
the thread, and I don't think that either of them have said anything in this 
thread.

- Jonathan M Davis