A different tuple syntax

[Peter Williams]

On 30/05/13 23:14, eles wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 13:02:24 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>> Frank Fuente:
>> The syntax with tup() is longer but less noisy.
>
> I prefer tup() over the @{} thing, although I would like to have
> something that looks like "a syntax" instead of "a function".
>

Yes, don't over use {} as they'll be need for sets when they're added :-)

Peter