[OT] Stack safety in Rust

[bearophile]

David Nadlinger:

> http://cmr.github.io/blog/2013/10/21/on-stack-safety/
>
> It's a new blog post by Corey Richardson, discussing how to 
> mitigate memory corruption due to stack overflows.

(Sorry for the late answer).

Very nice article, it presents a interesting hybrid strategy. It 
seems Rust designers have understood some of the disadvantages of 
the segmented stacks Walter wrote about.

D used to print a "stack overflow", and it was a nice thing. Is D 
using a a single guard page after the stack of a thread? If this 
is true can't D intercept the page fault and print the that error 
message again?

Bye,
bearophile