Why the @ in @safe? & UDAs

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-11-07 08:39, Daniel Kozak wrote:

> What exactly do you mean?

You can do this:

@(1) void foo () { }
@(1) void bar () { }

Some library might treat @(1) in one way, and another library in a 
different way. If only user defined types were allowed the fully quailed 
name can be used do disambiguate the UDA's.

module libA;
struct attr { int a; }

module libB;
struct attr { int a; }

@libA.attr(1) void foo () { }
@libB.attr(1) void bar () { }

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg