Review of std.signal

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-11-07 14:45, Dicebot wrote:
> Time to move forward with some more reviews :)
>
> Our current victim is std.signal by Robert Klotzner which is supposed to
> deprecate and supersede existing (and broken) std.signals

* If a template mixin, which uses the string mixin, is provided the 
syntax will look a bit nicer

* Isn't it better to use an enum for the protection attributes?

* Would it make sense to allow "export" as a protection attribute as well?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg