Parallel Rogue-like benchmark

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 08/11/13 04:13, logicchains wrote:
> Benchmark author here. I left the ldmd2 entry there to represent the performance
> of the D implementation from the time of the benchmark, to highlight that the
> current D implementation is much newer than the others, and that there have been
> no attempts to optimise the C and C++ versions similarly to how the latest D
> version was optimised. If you feel it creates needless confusion I can remove
> it, however, or put a note next to it stating the above.

Seems fine to me to compare two different code implementations, but displaying 
things as you have suggests this is a compiler difference.  For proper 
comparison, you should probably compile both codes with ldc2 and the same 
optimizations, and see how they compare.