DIP 45 - approval discussion

[Timon Gehr]

On 11/10/2013 12:42 PM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> Am 08.11.2013 20:32, schrieb Walter Bright:
>  > It looks pretty good, except I have serious reservations about the
> -lib switch proposed behavior:
> I'm glad you like the proposal.
>
>  >
>  > 1. It's too blunt. A user could conceivably want to export some
> symbols and not others. This is all or nothing.
> A user is already able to control which symbols are exported and which
> are not by using the "export" attribute. ...

Using the export attribute on some member exports the entire module 
info. If I understand this right, the module info will contain 
information also about non-exported members of the module and therefore 
even non-exported members will be accessible from outside. Is this correct?