Equality operator chaining?

[Shammah Chancellor]

On 2013-11-10 18:45:14 +0000, bearophile said:
> It avoids code like this, that needs an auxiliary variable:
> 
> aux = foo(n);
> if (n == aux && aux == bar(n) && ...
> 
> 
> Is this idea going to cause troubles with operator overloading or 
> something else? Do you like it? Is it important enough?
> 
> Bye,
> bearophile

if( n == (foo(n) == bar(n)))  is legal.