Thoughts about D package management on Gentoo

[Dicebot]

On Monday, 11 November 2013 at 17:05:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> There is current no 'release' per say for Go.  So the version 
> of Go would
> be whatever was the current stable as of the GCC release (or 
> closing of
> stage1 development).

Well, you do realize it is completely unsuitable for D and will 
never work this way, don't you? :) And while I generally like to 
rant about lack of stable development process, GCC inverted 
approach seems much worse for anything that is not set in stone 
language covered by formalistic standard.