What’s Wrong with OOP and FP

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-11-14 10:37, Don wrote:

> I just can't escape the feeling that class-based runtime polyphorphism
> is almost never an ideal solution, and that most of the benefits and
> success of OOP languages comes from things other than OOP itself. And I
> think it's because OOP is philosophically nonsense -- in the real world,
> similarities between things are everywhere, but almost none of them are
> is-A relationships.

I think the most useful parts of OOP is encapsulation and have the data 
and methods in the same place.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg