Feature request: Bringing mixed-in operators and constructors to the overload set

[Tommi]

On Tuesday, 19 November 2013 at 22:51:10 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 11:13 AM, Tommi wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 01:17:20 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> On Monday, 11 November 2013 at 21:58:44 UTC, Tommi wrote:
>>>> Filed an enhancement request:
>>>> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11500
>>>
>>> Everything should work the same way.
>>
>> Do you mean that what I'm reporting is a compiler-bug rather 
>> than a
>> feature request?
>
> I'd argue yes, but similar issues have surprisingly attracted 
> some controversy in the past. (The constructor aliasing is an 
> enhancement though as it extends the language grammar.)

Hmmm... decisions decisions. I changed it from enhancement to bug 
(normal priority) anyway.