@property (again)

[Wyatt]

On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 13:04:21 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> 3) properties decay to normal functions when they have their 
> address taken
>
Is there some reason why we _need_ to be able to take the address 
of properties?  I've yet to see a good argument in favour of it, 
and I've seen several against.  I think that whole idea is a 
misfeature that won't be missed.

-Wyatt