@property (again)

[eles]

On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 15:25:21 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 13:28:01 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 11/21/2013 02:04 PM, John Colvin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 3) properties decay to normal functions when they have their 
>>> address taken
>>
>> No, why?
>
> properties should be just "variables without address".

and without shortcut operators such as ++ and +=

let's implement this simple model first. you could build latter 
on it whatever you want, but at least let's give some layer of 
consistency paint to tis issue.

PS: I hate the solution for the #11365