DIP 50 - AST macros

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Fri Nov 22 02:17:03 PST 2013


On 2013-11-22 10:27, luka8088 wrote:

> Um, my it's suppose to be the same as <[ ... ]> but I liked t{ ... }
> syntax better as it looked more consistent with what D already has. But
> I should have used <[ ... ]> , my mistake sorry.

I thought you argued that the t{ } need to contain semantically valid code?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list