D vs Go in real life

Paulo Pinto pjmlp at progtools.org
Sat Nov 23 21:45:09 PST 2013


Am 23.11.2013 15:16, schrieb Chris:
> On Saturday, 23 November 2013 at 00:13:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>> Chris:
>>
>>> But D goes deeper. D raises fundamental questions about how
>>> a good program should look like, what is good / practicable.
>>
>> You could write a blog post/article to explain why you think this,
>> with some examples.
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
>
> Sure. One of the reasons is that you have the choice. OO, structs,
> ranges, functional. This makes me think about how to solve which
> problem. In Java you get one concept, OO, and that's it. What do you do?
> Write a class, what ever the task at hand may be.

Well,

structs => Packed Objects (IBM J9, being discussed for Java 9)

ranges => Iterator/Iterable/Streams (Java 8)

functional => Method handles/Lambda (Java 8)

--
Paulo




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list