std.complex

David Nadlinger code at klickverbot.at
Tue Nov 26 08:11:17 PST 2013


On Monday, 25 November 2013 at 08:18:43 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
> But if you just think of 0 as a number, then
>
> 0 * lim{x --> inf} x
>              = lim{x --> inf} (0 * x)

This is where your argument falls apart, as mathematically, you 
can't do that unless lim{x --> inf} x is well-defined.

See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_sphere

David



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list