scoped allocations

[Andrea Fontana]

On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 at 23:33:59 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>
> Temp!int arr = Temp!int(512); /// arr is destroyed at the end 
> of the scope
> ----
>
> But that does not look very nice (especially because Temp!int 
> does not indicate that it holds an array).

If you call it something other than "Temp" maybe it sounds better.

auto arr = ScopedArray!int(512);

Makes sense for me.