Should "std.net.curl" be moved from Phobos to Deimos?

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Thu Nov 28 11:29:04 PST 2013


On 11/28/13 11:17 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 08:36:08 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2013-11-27 21:46, Dicebot wrote:
>>> Distributing binaries for Mac and Windows is fine (though it is much
>>> better to keep those separate archives and patch DVM accordingly), this
>>> thread is about Linux ones. You did not have any problems with it
>>> because Debian derivatives take major percentage of users and you are
>>> likely to have one.
>>
>> If we're removing the zip as it currently is, it's another prof that D
>> isn't stable as it claims to be.
>
> The zip has nothing to do with the stability of D itself. It just has to do
> with the stalibity of how D is distributed, which is a completely different
> issue. I can see why you care about the zip, given that you wrote and maintain
> a tool which relies on it, but calling D unstable because we might change how
> we release it would be like calling KDE or gnome unstable, because they
> changed from distributing their code in tar.gz files to tar.bz2 files. How a
> program or library is distributed has nothing to do with the stability of the
> code itself.

Besides the fundamental point remains. People don't need to download all 
platform files on one platform. It just doesn't follow. And the larger 
the distribution will become the more annoying the issue will be.

Andrei




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list