review queue: next?

[Jesse Phillips]

On Wednesday, 2 October 2013 at 15:07:43 UTC, ilya-stromberg 
wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 September 2013 at 15:11:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Sunday, 29 September 2013 at 14:58:17 UTC, ilya-stromberg 
>> wrote:
>>> It looks like we finished review of std.d.lexer.
>>> Do you have any plans to start review for Robert Schadek's 
>>> std.logger?
>>
>> Brian has made several quick fixes/modifications and I am 
>> expecting that either second review or final voting will take 
>> pretty soon. That is why I did not move forward with other 
>> review queue proposals. Right now I am awaiting Brians mail 
>> with some details regarding outcome of first review, something 
>> will happen as soon as it will arrive.
>>
>> I guess std.logger will be the very next one.
>
> OK, I see.
> May I ask: who can vote? Only old community members or 
> everybody? Any additional conditions?

All can vote. Voting may include one condition for acceptance or 
a brief explanation of why it is rejected. Discussion of opinion 
should not be in the voting thread.