ctrl+c and destructors

[Sean Kelly]

On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:34 AM, Paulo Pinto <pjmlp at progtools.org> wrote:

> I don't do UNIX system programming at C level since 2002, but my POSIX memories, is that it is as portable as C, with its share of undefined behaviors and OS specific extensions.

Posix is super portable largely because the spec is very loose.  Not many functions actually have to be declared, and of those that must be declared, some can actually return an error when called that indicates they aren't implemented.  And what's allowed in signal handlers, for example, is very limited as well, for similar reasons.  This is one area where Windows really did things right.  As Don has noted in the past, SEH is really fantastic.  I still do systems level C programming as my primary job responsibility, and my dislike of signals is nearly boundless at this point.  Even for things that make sense like SIGCHLD, the limited options available within signal handlers make actually doing anything useful surprisingly hard.  I really wish Posix routines were required to use critical sections to delay signals until handling them wouldn't break anything.