goto a no-go?

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 3 October 2013 at 02:21:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 10/2/13 10:06 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 2 October 2013 at 16:12:58 UTC, Jesse Phillips 
>> wrote:
>>>    if (word.length)
>>>        scope(exit) FormatOutput();
>>>
>>> This is the same as
>>>
>>>    if (word.length)
>>>        FormatOutput();
>>>
>>> The `if` introduces a new scope, thus running the code right 
>>> away.
>>
>> Oops, shame on me. Too many `static if`s in my life :(
>
> I think it's a common mishap. Might be nice if the compiler 
> disallowed gramatically an unbraced if/while/etc containing 
> only one scope statement.
>
> Andrei

Or more generally cope statement at the end of a scope.