std.rational -- update and progress towards review

[Dicebot]

On Thursday, 3 October 2013 at 11:14:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
> As the one who'd be managing the review process, do you have 
> any preferences for how I handle the issues I raised above?  Do 
> you think it'd be better to parcel the potentially broadly 
> useful code out across different Phobos modules as suggested or 
> let the review process decide what goes where?

My role as review manager does not matter here. Responsibility of 
review manager is to collect opinions and information from 
community, he does not have any authority of his own.

Remembering std.serialization discussion though, it felt like 
people are more in favor of merging generic functionality into 
matching modules instead of keeping everything self-contained.

You can also just do pull requests for smaller parts without any 
review if they are decoupled from std.rational - but be warned 
that waiting until those are reviewed and merged by Phobos devs 
may take a considerable time ;)

In the end it is your own judgment. There are no strict rules and 
it is always good to see a module with personality behind ;)