review queue: next?

[ilya-stromberg]

On Wednesday, 2 October 2013 at 15:46:06 UTC, Jesse Phillips 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 October 2013 at 15:07:43 UTC, ilya-stromberg 
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, 29 September 2013 at 15:11:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 29 September 2013 at 14:58:17 UTC, ilya-stromberg 
>>> wrote:
>>>> It looks like we finished review of std.d.lexer.
>>>> Do you have any plans to start review for Robert Schadek's 
>>>> std.logger?
>>>
>>> Brian has made several quick fixes/modifications and I am 
>>> expecting that either second review or final voting will take 
>>> pretty soon. That is why I did not move forward with other 
>>> review queue proposals. Right now I am awaiting Brians mail 
>>> with some details regarding outcome of first review, 
>>> something will happen as soon as it will arrive.
>>>
>>> I guess std.logger will be the very next one.
>>
>> OK, I see.
>> May I ask: who can vote? Only old community members or 
>> everybody? Any additional conditions?
>
> All can vote. Voting may include one condition for acceptance 
> or a brief explanation of why it is rejected. Discussion of 
> opinion should not be in the voting thread.

What happens if I vote "Yes with condition", but module developer 
will not satisfy the condition? My vote will be calculated as 
"No", as "Yes", or will not calculated at all?
In which term module developer should satisfy the condition if he 
wants to do this? Before merge pull request to the Phobos?