std.rational -- update and progress towards review

Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Fri Oct 4 13:39:25 PDT 2013


On 04/10/13 21:00, Brad Roberts wrote:
> Ideally, the unrelated but required non-rational code would be delt with before
> the review, then the issue is moot.  If you've got important or useful changes
> to other parts of phobos, separate them and get them delt with.

I don't mind doing that, but it seemed to me that _all_ of this code deserved 
the level of scrutiny that a formal review would bring, both generic and 
specialized parts.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list