std.rational -- update and progress towards review
Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Fri Oct 4 13:39:25 PDT 2013
On 04/10/13 21:00, Brad Roberts wrote:
> Ideally, the unrelated but required non-rational code would be delt with before
> the review, then the issue is moot. If you've got important or useful changes
> to other parts of phobos, separate them and get them delt with.
I don't mind doing that, but it seemed to me that _all_ of this code deserved
the level of scrutiny that a formal review would bring, both generic and
specialized parts.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list