Official stdx

Kagamin spam at here.lot
Mon Oct 7 08:36:21 PDT 2013


On Friday, 4 October 2013 at 10:49:58 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> The lack of promise of API stability in stdx would have to be 
> very explicit and obvious.

Then call it `experimental` instead of stdx. That's obvious (stdx 
sound like an extension of std library). I wonder if someone 
would complain that experimental module broke.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list