std.d.lexer : voting thread

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Monday, October 07, 2013 17:47:27 simendsjo wrote:
> On Monday, 7 October 2013 at 13:29:30 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> > On Sunday, 6 October 2013 at 18:54:55 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> >> Any formal review may potentially result in short voting after
> >> if no critical issues are found so I don't think it makes
> >> sense in making any additional announcements. There are no
> >> special points of attention - if review was declared and you
> >> want to make some input, it should be done right there.
> > 
> > Yes, but people are lazy. I don't talk about all of us, but
> > most of people are lazy.
> > Somebody of us will vote because it's interesting, but will not
> > read/write review tread because it requests a time.
> > So, additional announce of upcoming voting can help: "Guys, if
> > you want to vote, it's time to read documentation and write
> > your really cool idea before voting".
> 
> This is the reason I've not cast any votes for standard modules -
> I haven't had the time, or don't have the competence, to cast a
> valid vote. It would be like voting for a political party without
> knowing where all parties stands in all cases.

So, it would be like your typical political vote then. ;)

- Jonathan m Davis