The "no gc" crowd

[Peter Alexander]

On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 16:22:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 15:43:46 UTC, ponce wrote:
>> Is there a plan to have a standard counter-attack to that kind 
>> of overblown problems?
>> It could be just a solid blog post or a @nogc feature.
>
> It is not overblown. It is simply "@nogc" which is lacking but 
> absolutely mandatory. Amount of hidden language allocations 
> makes manually cleaning code of those via runtime asserts 
> completely unreasonable for real project.

Please no more attributes. What next, @nomalloc?

Making sure your code doesn't allocate isn't that difficult.